TAMAR CONGRESS MATCHPOINT PAIRS S1 (21-FEB-26)

Pair 3 - FLOYD SUBAN / MICHAEL JOHNSON
Place: 8, Percentage: 54.26%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	11: RICHARD COOKE / MARGARET GIBBS	4 N	2C	10	-420	0	0%
Board 2	11: RICHARD COOKE / MARGARET GIBBS	4 S	QD	10	-620	1	5%
Board 3	11: RICHARD COOKE / MARGARET GIBBS	3NT N	AS	9	-400	2	10%
Board 4	6: BOB RANSON / FRANK MILFORD	3NT S	5H	8	100	15	75%
Board 5	6: BOB RANSON / FRANK MILFORD	3NT N	JH	11	-660	6	30%
Board 6	6: BOB RANSON / FRANK MILFORD	4 S	AC	10	-420	5	25%
Board 7	14: LIL HAY / MARGIE MARKOS	3 S	6S	8	-100	1	5%
Board 8	14: LIL HAY / MARGIE MARKOS	5 N	AS	10	-50	1	5%
Board 9	14: LIL HAY / MARGIE MARKOS	3 E	KS	9	-110	13	65%
Board 10	1: ELIZABETH SWARD / REXINE STOTT	3 N	6H	8	-100	15	75%
Board 11	1: ELIZABETH SWARD / REXINE STOTT	3 S	KC	10	130	14	70%
Board 12	1: ELIZABETH SWARD / REXINE STOTT	2 E	AD	9	-140	12	60%
Board 13	8: STEVE NEWMAN / MARTIN LE FEVRE	2 E	QC	7	100	17	85%
Board 14	8: STEVE NEWMAN / MARTIN LE FEVRE	4 E	JH	9	50	12	60%
Board 15	8: STEVE NEWMAN / MARTIN LE FEVRE	3NT W	6D	11	-460	12	60%
Board 16	5: HELEN HEBBLETHWAITE / DEBBIE MAREE MARTYN	4 W	6S	11	650	15	75%
Board 17	5: HELEN HEBBLETHWAITE / DEBBIE MAREE MARTYN	3 E	AH	7	-100	13	65%
Board 18	5: HELEN HEBBLETHWAITE / DEBBIE MAREE MARTYN	1 S	8C	8	-110	8	40%
Board 19	10: VERE VAN INGEN / ROGER SWAIN	2NT S	5C	6	100	16	80%
Board 20	10: VERE VAN INGEN / ROGER SWAIN	2 W	2C	8	110	10	50%
Board 21	10: VERE VAN INGEN / ROGER SWAIN	2 S	QC	6	200	17	85%
Board 22	9: JANE EDLER / RUDI LIDL	3NT S	KD	9	400	18	90%
Board 23	9: JANE EDLER / RUDI LIDL	2 W	3H	7	100	16	80%
Board 24	9: JANE EDLER / RUDI LIDL	2 W	AS	9	-110	20	100%
Board 25	7: SIMON HANDBY / STEPHANIE MCQUEEN	4X N	KC	7	500	16	80%
Board 26	7: SIMON HANDBY / STEPHANIE MCQUEEN	1NT S	3S	7	-90	10	50%
Board 27	7: SIMON HANDBY / STEPHANIE MCQUEEN	2 N	AD	7	50	8	40%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results